12/26/2023 0 Comments Crashplan synology nas![]() ![]() So an offsite backup system should back up not from your consolidated onsite storage, but from each device individually. ![]() If something goes wrong or gets corrupted on the primary backup, its mirror gets the same problem. posted by scruss to Computers & Internet (10 answers total) 20 users marked this as a favoriteīest answer: First, a backup of a backup is not a second backup. Swappable drives would be good are home/office NASs there yet for seamless redundant drives? I'm not looking to run a desktop machine as a NAS, as they're too loud and draw too much power. ![]() The NAS would be on our wired network, and powered through a UPS. I would like to have occasional online access to files should I need them when I'm away. I'm not wild about staying with SpiderOak while its de-duping and security is rather good, its pricing and cross-platform/architecture support isn't. I'm unlikely to be bothered to go through and clean them up manually. There's likely a ton of duplicate files on all of these. Likely has about 100 GB of stuff that's nowhere else Mirrors the music backup, and haphazard bits of everything else (when I remember). These drives are likely about to conk out any time now. A D-Link DNS323 two-bay NAS running 5+ year old 1 TB WD drives.Probably no more than 50 GB on all of them. Many little Linux boxes, from Raspberry Pis up to a ThinkPad, running various video/audio/multimedia/radio control applications around the house.An old Linux box with pretty much my entire (online) life from 1991–2010 on it (300 GB).An mp3 collection of about 300 GB, currently living on 6 year old USB drive connected to a SheevaPlug.Only locally backed up to a FireWire Time Machine. Backed up locally to a USB Time Machine (desperately, annoyingly slow) and mirrored to SpiderOak. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |